
"God" as a Personification of Undeniable Reality

Birth, life, death, the cycles and rhythms of Nature, the elemental forces of the Universe—these are undeniably real. Like it or not, we humans have always been in an inescapable relationship with a Reality that we could neither fully predict nor control. And given the nature of our brains, there's one thing that people in every culture and throughout history have instinctually done: we've used metaphors and analogies to understand and relate to that which is unavoidably, undeniably real and/or mysterious. We can't not do this. Consciously or unconsciously, we will always interpret via metaphors.
ALL images and concepts of God are more or less meaningful interpretations and personifications of Undeniable Reality, or Unavoidable Mystery. And it didn't take a genius to figure out that if you trust, or have faith, in what is ultimately inescapable, your life works better than if you judge or resist what is Real. This is not theological rocket science.
Whenever any story, any culture, or any scriptural passage claims "God said this..." or "God did that...," what follows is necessarily a meaningful interpretation of some individual or group's inner or outer experience; it is never a measurable fact. In other words, had CNN or ABC News been there to record the moment of divine revelation, there would have been nothing out of the ordinary (nothing miraculous) to report on the evening news—nothing other than what was coming out of someone's mouth, or pen, or whatever folks wrote with back then. If we fail to understand this, we belittle God and will surely miss what Reality is revealing today. And we mock God if we imagine that a truly divine communicator would have spoken to humanity as a whole more clearly through goat herders and fisherman in the distant past, via their dreams and intuitions, than through cumulative evidence discovered by the global community of scientists alive today. After all, if the worldwide, self-correcting scientific endeavor is anything, it is the pursuit of collective intelligence and a cultural system designed to hold people accountable for their factual statements—their truth claims.
As I discuss at length in Part II of TGFE ("Reality is Speaking"), facts are God's native tongue. In the same way that Reality is always speaking to us individually through our feelings, circumstances, and relationships (i.e., through our experience), empirical evidence is how Reality (God) speaks to us collectively. Few things are more important, it seems to me, than appreciating this and acting on it at all levels of society, the sooner the better.
Fortunately, this perspective seems to be resonating with lots of heavyweight science and religion leaders:
Endorsements from Nobel Prize-winning scientists
Praise from other Science Luminaries
Response from Religious Leaders Across the Spectrum (by Affiliation)
Also see:
Are God and Satan Real?
The Silly Debate Over God's Existence
Evolution as Meaningful, Inspiring Fact










Entering the conversation
Hi Michael.
Thanks for your site and for all your doing for our species! As a Vineyard pastor working in Belgium, I have a few questions:
1. What is the difference between creatheism and pantheism and panentheism?
2. What if God is bi-lingual and speaks metaphors as well as facts as his native tongue?
3. Can we apriori rule out miracles as flatland theology, or could some people, e.g. Jesus, have been more evolved than most and funtioned at a higher level of Reality? Would it be better to call him hypernatural rather than supernatural in his acts?
Thanks for any insights and help. I am very open to learn.
Blessings in Jesus,
David
David Bolton
Excellent questions, David!
Thanks for the acknowledgement, David. Your questions deserve a more thoughtful response than I have time to offer now, but, at least here's my initial response:
1) I discuss this exact question in Chapter 7 ("What Do We Mean By the Word 'God'?) of TGFE, specifically on pages 128-132.
2) Surely this the case, but I love the way you've stated it! As I say in the blog post above, God is always speaking to us as individuals through our experience—via feelings, circumstances, and relationships. But ultimately we are responsible for how we interpret these. Metaphors that lead us in the direction of greater integrity, love, compassion, commitment, and so forth (i.e, in the direction of greater Christ-likeness), are, to my mind, a particularly delicious form of divine communication.
3) The position you mention here is a thoroughly respectable one that many devout Christians hold. If you're interested, my own take on this can be found in Appendix B of TGFE: "REALizing the Miraculous". If you cannot easily obtain a copy of my book where you are, let me know and I'd be happy to send you a complementary copy of the new Plume paperback edition. My email is Michael(AT)ThankGodforEvolution.com
Vineyard churches are some of my favorites. I love the passionate energy.
Blessings on your ministry!
~ Michael
Ordered your book!
Many thanks for your comments Michael and your kind offer to send me a complimentary copy of your book.
I have actually just ordered your book in the new paperback edition from Amazon, which has just shipped! As the good book says, a workman deserves his wages! I look forward to going deeper into your message and hopefully dialoguing further with you. I'm also currently reading 'All That is: A Naturalistic Faith for the Twenty-First Century' by Arthur Peacocke. I look forward to comparing your insights with his and seeing where I come out!
Grace and Peace
David
David Bolton
Let me know what you think
Let me know what you think of Peacocke's "All That Is". I've read several of his earlier books but not that one. And, of course, I welcome your critical thoughts on mine too.
Co-evolutionary blessings,
~ Michael